La littérature des Premières Nations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notre présentation s ́attachera à évaluer les stratégies éditoriales des écrivain-e-s des Premières Nations au Québec en analysant la manière dont ceux-ci s ́adressent à un lectorat plus large grâce à l ́usage d ́une langue de communication, en l ́occurrence le français pour le cas des communautés innues au Québec. L ́hypothèse proposée est celle de l ́usage de la fiction pour faire passer un message proprement politique liée à la survivance d ́une culture minoritaire dominée historiquement et socialement. En nous appuyant sur les analyses de Jacques Derrida sur l ́éthos de la survivance et sur la réflexion de Homi K. Bhabha sur la pensée de la décolonisation, nous souhaiterions montrer en quoi cette littérature rend visible et sensible une forme d ́ethnopoétique originale.<br><br>Presentationen analyserar två författarinnor från Québec, Rita Mestokosho och Naomi Fontaine, som använder franska språket för att kunna nå en bredare publik. De illustrerar en "decolonial" tendens när de hänvisar till hur Innu samhället försöker skydda ett sätt att leva. <br>The presentation examines the way the writers of the First Nations in Canada deal with the issue of survivance which implies a collective resilience. It is based upon a comparison between the first novel of Naomi Fontaine, <i>Kuessipan</i>(2011)<i></i>and the poetry of Rita Mestokosho collected in <i>How I see Life, Grandmother, Eshi Uapataman Nukum, Comment je perçois la vie, grand-mère</i>(2011). Both writers share the paradigm of decoloniality with a minimalist aesthetics to express the beauty of the Innu way of life. <br><br><br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.972 | 0.841 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".