MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962808528 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.21957113

Changes in size at age and condition of cod (Gadus morhua) off Labrador and eastern Newfoundland during 1978-2000

2001· report· en· W6962808528 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) · 2001
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapelinStock (firearms)Fish stockSubmarine pipelineGadusStock assessmentClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The size-at-age and condition of cod (Gadus morhua) off Labrador and eastern Newfoundland (Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization divisions 2J+3KL) were monitored by sampling catches during research bottom-trawl surveys in the offshore during the autumns of 1978-2000. There was considerable spatial, temporal, and individual variability in both size-at-age and condition. Previous investigations have provided evidence that some of the annual variability in these attributes is related to changes in ocean temperature, stock size, and the biomass or availability of prey, notably capelin (Mallotus villosus). However, such explanations are often insufficient because the annual patterns of change varied spatially within the stock. It is shown that inadequacies in sampling, changes in fish distribution, very high apparent mortality and uncertainty regarding trends in prey abundance contribute to difficulty in discerning annual variability in well-being of the cod. Such complications also confound an assessment of the extent to which poor condition might have contributed to the collapse of the stock during the early 1990s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)French-language works237,207