MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962866331 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/v6jcg

PRISMA-ScR Protocol: Psilocybin therapy for demoralization in patients with terminal illness, a scoping review

2025· other· en· W6962866331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsilocybinDistressExistentialismTerminal cancerDepression (economics)Cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A scoping review to conceptualise and map the breadth of studies concerning psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for existential distress and demoralization for patients with life-limiting illness. Psilocybin has demonstrated effective and lasting effects, up to 4.5 years, in clinical studies (Agin-Liebes et al., 2020) to treat existential distress in patients with cancer and is relatively safe in controlled settings even though it is a powerful drug. Psilocybin can be accessed by application to health authorities in Australia, Canada, Switzerland and couple of states in the USA (Oregon and Colorado) to treat existential distress and treatment resistant depression but is not widely available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.112
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.112
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.013
Bibliometrics0.0150.014
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207