MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6962982334 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200634

Electric Car Purchase Intentions in Vietnam’s Emerging Economy: The Moderating Role of Technology Discomfort

2025· article· en· W6962982334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric carsElectric vehicleConsumption (sociology)Consumer behaviourTechnology acceptance model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pro-environmental consumption has emerged as a significant global trend over the past decade, particularly evident in the increased consumer interest in electric vehicles (EVs).Despite extensive research on EV adoption, limited attention has been given to technology-related factors, particularly the discomfort associated with adopting new technologies.To address this gap, the present study investigates the moderating effect of technology discomfort on electric car purchase intentions in Vietnam, an emerging economy.Utilizing a sample of 516 potential EV buyers, this study examines how technology discomfort influences the mediating effects of pro-environmental attitudes and pro-environmental self-identity on purchase intention.The findings reveal that technology discomfort significantly moderates these mediation relationships, underscoring its crucial role in consumers' decision-making processes regarding EV adoption.This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and marketers aiming to promote electric vehicle adoption in emerging markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning→Same topicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business→French-language works237,207→