PATIENT SAFETY IN MAJOR ONCOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES: SCOPING REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PROTOCOL - SCOPING REVIEW PATIENT SAFETY IN MAJOR ONCOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES: SCOPING REVIEW Objective: Identify and synthesize scientific evidence on patient safety in major oncological emergencies. Question wording P (Population) – cancer patient C (Concept) – patient safety C (Context) – nurse care during major oncological emergencies What scientific evidence, in the context of nursing care in major oncological emergencies, is available to ensure patient safety? Inclusion criteria Will be included: studies published in full in English, Spanish and Portuguese; dealing with patient safety in oncological emergencies, published from 2013 to date (Ordinance No. 874/GM/MS, of May 16, 2013: National Policy for Cancer Prevention and Control in the Health Care Network) Health of People with Chronic Diseases within the Unified Health System (SUS). Exclusion criteria Will be excluded: single case studies, editorials, experience reports, annals of events, theoretical essays, narrative literature review. Data collect Data base: - Medline via the National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health (PubMed); - Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), - SCOPUS; - Web of Science; - Base; - Cochrane Library. Gray literature search: - CAPES Theses and Dissertations Catalog - DART-Europe E-Theses Portal - Electronic Theses Online Service (EThOS) - Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal (RCAAP) - National ETD Portal - Theses Canada - Latin American Thesis Portal - World Cat Dissertations and Theses • Identification of descriptors and keywords Descriptors and keywords used in studies that address the topic of interest from the combination of MeSH identified for the research mneumonic: (Acute tumor lysis syndrome OR Metabolic Diseases OR Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone OR Hydroelectrolytic disorders OR Diabetes insipidus OR Malignant bowel obstruction OR Superior Vena Cava Syndrome OR Superior Mediastinal Syndrome OR Leukocytosis OR Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia OR Febrile Neutropenia OR Spinal Cord Compression OR Airway Obstruction) AND (Patient Safety [Mesh] OR Risk Management [Mesh] OR Medication Errors [Mesh] ) AND (Neoplasms [Mesh] OR Oncology Nursing [Mesh] OR Oncology [Mesh]).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.074 | 0.077 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".