Punjabi translation of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and to evaluate its adaptation, validity and reliability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a self-assessment tool developed by Kirkley et al. (2003) to measure disease-specific quality of life in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff disorders. t was originally developed in English and then translated in different languages to measures its usability in different cultures. The study aims to translate and culturally adapt the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) into Punjabi and assess its validity and reliability. Following Beaton’s Guidelines, the translation process included forward and backward translation by two translators, with approval from the original developer. Content validation was conducted using the Delphi method with 10 field experts having over five years of experience. Cultural adaptation involved 30 outpatient participants who provided feedback on scale clarity. Concurrent validation compared P-WORC scores with WORC and DASH, while reliability testing was performed with 51 patients to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".