MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963070295 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.20191787

Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of the ecosystem

2022· report· en· W6963070295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packArcticOcean gyreArctic sea ice declineArctic dipole anomalyDrift iceArctic geoengineeringBoundary currentEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The report provides a description of the ecosystem in the Central Arctic Ocean, or CAO. This is a deep-sea area with two main basins of depths to 4–5 km, separated by the Lomonosov Ridge. The CAO is a globally unique ecosystem, characterized by presence of sea ice and very low primary production by phytoplankton and ice algae. Atlantic water flows into the CAO through the deep Fram Strait and across the Barents Sea shelf, and continues as a set of boundary currents anti-clockwise around the slopes of the CAO basins. The circulation of the boundary currents takes place at an intermediate depth of about 200–1000 m, underneath a gradient layer with strong salinity and density stratification, and a seasonally dynamic top layer with two prominent circulation features: the Beaufort Gyre in Canada Basin, and the Transpolar Drift across the North Pole that exits in Fram Strait. A smaller amount of Pacific water (ratio of about 1:5 to Atlantic water) flows north through the Chukchi Sea and into the gradient layer between the surface polar water and the deeper Atlantic water of the boundary currents. The Pacific water exits primarily through Canadian Arctic Archipelago passages into Baffin Bay. The circulating waters and floating sea ice form the dynamic habitats of the animals and plants that constitute the living part of the CAO ecosystem. Large calanoid copepods, with <em>Calanus hyperboreus</em> as the most important species in terms of zooplankton biomass, reproduce successfully mainly in the peripheral parts of the CAO with seasonal ice cover. Sea ice amphipods, with <em>Gammarus wilkitzkii</em> and <em>Apherusa glacialis</em> as the two most prominent species, are the dominant group among the sea ice invertebrate fauna. An important issue addressed in the report, is how the ice fauna can maintain their populations by recolonizing new sea ice as it forms in autumn and winter. About 50 species of fish have been either found (39 species), or are considered likely to occur (14 species), in the CAO. Most of them are small species, dominated by eelpouts along the basin slopes, and sculpins on the upper slopes and surrounding shelves. Two small cods, polar cod (<em>Boreogadus saida</em>) and Arctic cod (<em>Arctogadus glacialis</em>), are assumed to be the most important fishes in the CAO foodwebs. Thirty-five species of birds and 35 species of marine mammals have been recorded in the CAO. Most of them are seasonal visitors, and the CAO plays small roles for their populations overall. Exceptions to this are two species of gulls, ivory gull (<em>Pagophila eburnea</em>) and Ross’s gull (<em>Rhodostethia rosea</em>), for which the marginal ice zone of the CAO in late summer provides a habitat for large parts of their global populations. Polar bear (<em>Ursus maritimus</em>) is the marine mammal with strongest dependence on sea ice habitats in the CAO. Considerable parts of several subpopulations of polar bear (Barents Sea, Laptev Sea, Chukchi Sea, Southern and Northern Beaufort Sea subpopulations) move seasonally with the retreating sea ice into the CAO in summer. There has been a large loss in sea ice since the 1990s in what is termed the “Great melt”, with a pronounced change from heavier multiyear pack ice to thinner annual ice. The report describes some of the associated changes in the CAO ecosystem associated with the loss and change in sea ice habitats. However, the main aim of this report is to provide detailed descriptions of the current CAO ecosystem and its various components, thereby providing a basis for more in-depth assessments on the impacts of climate change and other human activities in future. <strong>Changes carried out on 18/08/2022:</strong> PICES and PAME logos added, and information added to the disclaimer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)French-language works237,207