MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963073884 · doi:10.17632/rvnk26krjs

Geological and geophysical data compilation for the western Wabigoon and southern Abitibi subprovinces of the Superior Province, Ontario, Canada

2021· dataset· en· W6963073884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanGreenstone beltLithologyGeological surveyGeologic mapReflection (computer programming)Tilt (camera)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geological layers representing geological observations (e.g., structural measurements, mineral occurrences) and interpretations (e.g., faults traces, map units) for and Archean greenstone belt near Dryden and Timmins, Ontario, Canada in the geological Superior Province. Newly interpreted layers such as lithology polygons (‘MapUnits’) and structural traces (‘Geolines’) are included as ESRI shapefiles. Two geophysical datasets are provided, including a database of new magnetic susceptibility measurements from 2018 and 2019 field seasons near Dryden, Ontario. Additionally, an ensemble of reprocessed aeromagnetic grids (40 m by 40 m cell size) from the Ontario Geological Survey’s (2011) geophysical survey datasets are included as projected geo .tiff and .grd files. The ensemble includes total magnetic intensity with cosine roll off filtering, first vertical derivative, second vertical derivative, tilt derivative, and dynamic range compression. Hill-shaded relief grids are also included, and their azimuth and angle of incidence are indicated in their filename.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.023
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207