Mission d'appui au projet de développement de la filière laitière dans le bassin de Mbarara - Ouganda. Volets santé animale et contrôle de qualité du lait. Rapport de mission du 19 du 28 juin 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette mission d'appui au projet laitier de MBarara a permis de : Proposer un protocole d'enquête épidémiologique détaillé pour la tuberculose et la brucellose, à l'échelle du district, en définissant un plan d'échantillonnage s'appuyant, en particulier, sur les notions de strates, d'unité géographique de base et d'animal à risque. Pour la réalisation de cette enquête, le projet collabore étroitement avec le District Veterinary Office (OVO) de Mbarara ; Poursuivre le suivi de détection des mammites ; Renforcer la collaboration engagée en 1999 avec l'Université de MBarara pour le contrôle de qualité du lait avec la mise en place d'un laboratoire d'hygiène alimentaire, une formation continue à l'UNBS (Kampala) et la signature d'un accord de partenariat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".