Data for: A Revised Sea Level History for the Northern Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Counts of diatom species from terrestrial and marine sediment basins. The table documents counts of diatom species identified from sediment cores recovered from Quadra and Read islands, British Columbia, Canada. From Quaternary Science Review submission: Observed diatom floras were compared to those identified in Campeau et al. (1999), Cumming et al. (1995), Falu et al. (2000), Foged (1981), Hein (1990), Kelly et al. (2005), Pienitz et al. (2003) and Spaulding et al. (2010). Following Hustedt (1953), diatoms were assigned to five salinity classes: 1 - halophobian (fresh, salt intolerant), 2 - oligohalobous indifferent (freshwater), 3 - oligohalobous halophilous (freshwater species tolerant of salinity to 0.2 ppt), 4 - mesohalobous (brackish water species with optimal salinity between 0.2 and 30 ppt) and 5 - polyhalobous (marine water species with optimal salinity greater than 30 ppt).The salinity tolerance of identified floras was determined using the latter diatom flora references and data from Denys (1992), Guiry and Guiry (2017), Hustedt (1953), Marohasy and Abbot (2007), Wilson et al. (1996) and Zong and Sawai (2015)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.110 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".