Resource competition affects the developmental outcome of the acoustic parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following are data files required to generate figures in Dominguez et al. (2025) published in Annals of the Entomological Society of America. In this study, we investigate the effects of resource competition on the developmental outcomes of the the acoustic parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. Our results demonstrate that increasing fly larval competition with a host cricket reduces both pupation and eclosion success and produces significantly smaller fly pupae. Pupal width strongly predicts adult fly size, suggesting that the effects of larval competition carry forward into adulthood—even after direct competition has ended. These findings support the hypothesis that early nutritional constraints shape downstream fitness-related traits in the acoustic parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. See Dominguez et al. (2025) for details on data collection and analyses. R markdown file with detailed data analysis code and associated data files included in this repository.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it