COMPARISON OF CLASS IV LASER THERAPY AND PHONOPHORESIS IN PATIENTS WITH MEDIAL TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER TRIAL.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study is to see the comparative effect of Class IV Laser Therapy and Phonophoresis in Patients with Medial Tibiofemoral Joint osteoarthritis to reduce pain and improve the quality of life. Numeric pain rating scale is the Primary outcome measure used fir the assessment of the pain and Western Ontario and Mc-Master Universities Osteoarthritis Index is used to assess the quality of life. The intervention time is of 4 weeks with one week of washout period in between. There are two groups in group 1 Class IV Laser Therapy is given along with the conventional Physiotherapy and in group 2 Phonophoresis is given along with the conventional physiotherapy. Pre and Post intervention assessment was taken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it