MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963201877 · doi:10.17879/zkr-2022-4813

Ordinarius im Ordensvermögensrecht

2023· article· de· W6963201877 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster · 2023
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsSt. Peter's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)LimitingCripple

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dem Ordinarius kommen im Vermögensrecht der Institute des geweihten Lebens an verschiedenen Stellen bestimmte Kompetenzen zu. In klerikalen Instituten päpstlichen Rechts sind die Ordinarien nach c. 134 § 1 die höheren Oberen der Institute, gemäß des von Papst Franziskus am 18. Mai 2022 ausgestellten Reskripts an das DIVCSVA auch dann, wenn es sich ausnahmsweise um Laien handelt. Die Institute aber, die keinen eigenen Ordinarius haben, stellen die mit dem Ordinarius verbundenen Regelungen vor besondere Herausforderungen hinsichtlich ihrer Autonomie gemäß c. 586 § 1. Insbesondere wenn vom Ordinarius proprius die Rede ist (c. 1265 § 1, c. 1288 und c. 1302 § 3), bleibt teilweise schon im Text und auch in der kirchenrechtlichen Literatur unklar, wer eigentlich gemeint ist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitäts- und Landesbibliothek MünsterSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207