MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963568194 · doi:10.21963/11896

CTD sampling in Cambridge Bay, Dease Strait and Queen Maud Gulf, Nunavut

2016· dataset· en· W6963568194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Cryospheric Information Network · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCTDBaySeawaterSampling (signal processing)Submarine pipelineQueen (butterfly)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conductivity, temperature, as well as other properties at different depths are important characteristics of seawater, with significant effects on the ecology of the ocean in the Arctic. To gain an idea about these seawater properties south of Victoria Island, CTD samplings have been performed from the Martin Bergmann research vessel in the Cambridge Bay, Dease Strait and Queen Maud Gulf by CJ Mundy of the University of Manitoba. Additionally, in order to determine the ideal depth of the CHARS seawater intake pipe, and to meet the required salinity and temperature of the seawater flown into CHARS aquaria, a more targeted CTD sampling has been performed in a section of the east arm of Cambridge Bay offshore of the future CHARS site. This has been accomplished both with a smaller CTD probe launched from a skiff by CHARS staff (data in Ruskin file with extension .rsk, and same data in comma-separated text file, .csv, and Excel spreadsheet, .xls), as well as the larger CTD probe of the 'Martin Bergmann' research vessel by CJ Mundy (data in text files with .int extension).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Cryospheric Information NetworkFrench-language works237,207