MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963862866 · doi:10.25419/rcsi.26015620.v1

Irish National ICU Audit annual report: data from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022

2024· other· en· W6963862866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingAuditWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Unit (ring theory)Intensive care unitService (business)Dependency (UML)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report documents the work undertaken across the national network of Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and High Dependency Units (HDUs) caring for critically ill patients. Audit of this activity is essential for planning and resource allocation and in order to assure the quality of the care provided. Data coverage in participating Units during 2022 is illustrated in Table 1.1 (Chapter 1). There were significant gaps in quarters of data coverage. The most common reasons for these gaps were inadequate staffing of ICU Audit and the backlog caused by the recent COVID-19 pandemic and the infrastructural cyberattack on the Health Service Executive (HSE). The quarterly data submitted by all Units provide full coverage of the ICU activity for the quarter reported. This level of data coverage supports the comparison between Units based on the assumption that similar trends for a Unit would be observed over the course of each quarter in the year. Where it is necessary to compare counts of data items across Units in this report, counts for Units that had gaps in data were augmented through extrapolation to provide full-year estimates. Throughout this report, such uplifts are clearly labelled as ‘estimated’, and shown in lighter shading in bar/column charts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207