MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963863374 · doi:10.25377/sussex.22887434.v2

Humayun Kabir (1906-1969)

2023· other· en· W6963863374 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArts and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsCommissionPoliticsPrime ministerQuarter (Canadian coin)Statement (logic)Biography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humayun Kabir was an influential Indian educationist and politician. He dedicated his life to the field of education, contributing significantly to its development in India. After completing his education at Exeter College, Oxford, where he actively participated in various student activities, Kabir returned to India and became a lecturer at Andhra University. He later held several important positions, including Joint Education Adviser, Education Secretary, and Chairman of the University Grants Commission in Delhi. Kabir's commitment to education led to his appointment as the Minister of Education under the Prime Ministerships of Jawaharlal Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri. Kabir's contributions extended beyond his political career. He was an accomplished writer and orator, known for his poetry, short stories, novels, and essays. He also served as the editor of Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad's biography, "India Wins Freedom." Additionally, Kabir played a crucial role in drafting the UNESCO 1950 statement titled "The Race Question." Throughout his life, Humayun Kabir was a prominent figure in Indian education and politics, leaving behind a lasting impact on the intellectual and cultural landscape of the nation. <br> See Also: Photograph of Humayun Kabir

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5580.165

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207