MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6963896247 · doi:10.20381/ruor-28418

Impact of Polymer-Coated Urea Application Timing on Corn Yield in an IoT-based Smart Farming Application

2022· other· en· W6963896247 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArable landAgricultureFertilizerPopulationYield (engineering)Crop yieldAgricultural productivityExtensive farmingSoil quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The population of the world is increasing exponentially each year with a large population base. Agricultural fields are facing the pressure of dealing with food insufficiency, whereas the challenges of limited resources of arable land and fresh water on the earth should be taken into account at the same time. Smart farming was born at the right time to cope with the problem and has become one of the most powerful approaches to reducing the ecological footprint of farming and improving agricultural yield. The four most important variables that impact crop yield are soil productivity, the accessibility of water, climate, and pests or diseases. This thesis emphasizes the application of chemical fertilizers to corn and disregards the impact of water, pests, and disease for the moment. In this study, three scenarios are explored deeper one by one. The only factor that varies among the three scenarios is the nitrogen amount available to the plant. Fertilizers have outstanding performance in improving the yield and quality of plants in agricultural fields, and this is the emphasis of this thesis. Compared with the fertilizer properties and characteristics of frequently used commercial fertilizers, polymer-coated urea was selected as the fertilizer in this study because the feature of nitrogen can be released into the soil slowly and in a controlled manner. Scenario 1 created an ideal condition where unlimited nitrogen was provided to the corn. Scenario 2 assumed that a fixed amount of polymer-coated urea was applied at the beginning of the sowing season only. Scenario 3 figured out an optimal yield by separating the fertilizer application at the beginning and in the middle of the growing days with the same amounts of fertilizer used in Scenario 2. The model was performed based on historical data from Oklahoma and Ottawa using IoT sensors. The simulation model generated with Python figured out that approximately the end of June to the start of July is the best time to apply the remaining fertilizer, assuming that the sowing stage starts on May 1. The percentage of polymer-coated urea applied initially was found to usually be around 10% in the tested regions. The model was used to predict the yield in Ottawa using from 40.94 g/(m^2) in Scenario 2 to 55.43 g/(m^2) in Scenario 3, achieving an outstanding increasing rate of 35.38%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→French-language works237,207→