View of the Lee Tower Building on the Miracle Mile of Wilshire Boulevard, ca.1959
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photograph of a view of the Lee Tower (LT) Building on the Miracle Mile of Wilshire Boulevard, ca.1959. Wilshire is at center and is a six-lane divided road. Palm trees line the medians. There are several automobiles visible, including a truck and a bus at right. Wide cement sidewalks line both sides of the street and a series of utility cables crosses overhead. Several tall, rectangular buildings, including the Lee Tower Building, can be seen along the street, in addition to many smaller structures. On the left, the Dominguez building can be seen, and behind it, the Wilshire Tower building is partly visible with the Desmond's sign on it. Behind the Lee Tower building, the Prudential building can be partly seen. Miracle Mile was a commercial strip on Wilshire from LaBrea to Fairfax avenues developed in 1921 by realtor A.W. Ross who recognized that the automobile would decentralize downtown business. Legible signs include, from left to right: "Spanish", "Discount", "Steaks", "Give Give", "Vic Tanny", "Lens", "Columbia", Keep Right", "Pruden[tial]", "Park", "LT 5455", "California Bank", "Free Parking Huddle", "They saw [?] at Citizen's National Bank", "Pharmacy", "Security First National Bank of Los Angeles", and "Miracle Mile". Originally, the photograph was captioned as "View of the Prudential Building on the Miracle Mile of Wilshire Boulevard, ca.1959".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.345 | 0.073 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".