Football -- University of Southern California versus University of California Los Angeles football, 1958
Bibliographic record
Abstract
55 images. Football -- University of Southern California versus University of California Los Angeles football, 22 November 1958. (Sleeve reads: SP-12512); Caption slip reads: "Photographer: Jensen. Assignment: UCLA vs USC. 1st Q -- J-1: #17 UCLA, 9 yds. J-2: Maudlin intercepts & then drops ball. J-5: #17, 4 yds. J-6: UCLA fumble by Kilmer on bad pass from center. J-7: #20 USC 1st down. J-8: Referee down. J-9: UCLA drops ball. J-10: Pass to Brown, UCLA end zone. J-11-12: UCLA attempt field goal. 2nd quarter -- J-13: #35, 1st down, 29 yds. J-14: SC kicks, nearly blocked by UCLA. J-15: Pass to 80 UCLA, Coia & Buford on defense. 3rd Q -- J-17: Buford ret. J-18: USC, 1st T.D. J-98: USC xtra pt., 1st T.D. J-99: UCLA 2 pt. after 1st T.D. 4th Q -- J-25: Fast whistle on 25, Coia fumble on 25 yd line. J-26: SC attempts 3 pts. JX-116: Kilmer 1st down. JX-117-113: SC 2nd T.D. X-110: SC 2 pt. after 2nd T.D.".; Other caption slip reads: "Photographer: Monte[verde]. 1st Q: 45: #17 makes 25 yds. 46: #15 USC almost intercept ball meant for #31 Gilmer passed. 9: Buford #20 makes 1st down. 10: Pass meant for Brown knocked down by Brown, etc. in end zone. 2nd Q -- 21: #21 SC hit by #21 UCLA. 3rd Q -- 23: #17 UCLA hit by 80, 15 & 54. 24: USC T.D. 51: UCLA T.D. 52: Buford in kick return. 4th Q -- 59: #80 SC on punt return to 30. 60: UCLA conversion on 2nd T.D.".; Other caption slip reads: "Photographer: Rustan. Date: 1958-11-22. Assignment: UC -- SC. 1st quarter -- 39: UC 86 inc., 20 SC trys (sic) too and misses. 40: 30 UC injured. 5: 80 UC pass inc. 20 SC & 15 SC defending. 6: 81 UC inc. in end zone. 20, 15, 81 SC covering. 2nd Q -- 47: 83 UC inc., 15 & 20 SC defending. 48: 85 UC inc. on goal line. 3rd Q -- 33: SC misses latteral & SC recovers on 6 yard line. 34: 17 to 1 yd line. 59: 1st UC Touchdown. 60 UC 2 pts after T.D. 4th Q -- 96, 37: 17 UC injured after interception. 38: 80 SC. 1: SC field goal attempt. 2: UCLA intercepts pitch out for 2nd T.D. 57: 2nd SC TD. 95: 2 points after T.D. FLASH. 21: 80 SC inc. in end zone. 22: Coaches Billy Barnes, UCLA; & Don Clark, SC".; Supplementary material reads: 2nd half -- 46: Buford kickoff 5 to UCLA 42 - 50 yds crouch. 47: Maudlin pitched back to Buford, fumble- recovered by Wallace on SC 49. 48: Davis - reverse - Mar. McKeever 3 yds to SC 42. 49: Kilmer off tackle to SC 39, first down".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".