MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964349929 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25934986

An Airforce Love Story

2024· other· en· W6964349929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Oxford · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbarrassmentShot (pellet)Love storyDaughterStyle (visual arts)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The couple in question are Rober William Clement Wilde and Barbar Henrietta Bellew. Their daughter, the contributor, brought a large photograph album made of leather embossed with Egyptian symbols and monuments like pyramids and Sphinx.Her parents were both in the RAF. Her mother came from the West Country and her dad was from the East End and they met in Egypt during the war. The album records their experiences during the war. They were in Egypt for the whole of the war. Then her mother came home first and Dad later. The contributor pointed to one of the pictures labelled WOG with some embarrassment but said she had been told that it meant Western Oriental Gentleman! The pictures are all labelled and dated but she is puzzled by one or two which appear to have been bought- like the picture of Rommel. Her Mum was a corporal who made packs for the plane crews in case they were shot down and Dad was a private on the ground crew.They always said they had a good time in Egypt. They never talked about the bad times. They spent most of their time in Cairo but also went to Alexandria. In the album, there is a picture of Joe - A Canadian - and the daughter had met him on a trip to Canada.Her parents were both demobbed at the end of the war.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0300.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of OxfordSame topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207