MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964383358 · doi:10.25446/oxford.16976089

Crundale Grave 6

2021· other· en· W6964383358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Oxford · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGallon (US)Quarter (Canadian coin)HearthEarth (classical element)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We came next to a nest which contained a large ossuary of very coarse black earth [M 6791]; it was almost full of burnt bones and ashes, and will contain near a gallon and a half; it is seven inches and three-quarters high, and rather more than ten inches in diameter. Here was also a narrow-necked vessel, exactly like that described at No. 3, but something larger; it holds about six pints; it is nine inches and one quarter high, and seven inches and three quarters diameter, and is made of a coarse red earth [M 6839 ]. Here was also a patera of fine red earth, of the same size and shape as that described at No. 4 [M 6743]; it will hold about one pint and a half; in the centre of its bottom, on the inside, is the name of its maker, namely, IVNIVS, as at No. 2. Here was also another very beautiful smaller patera of fine red earth [M 6828]; it has two little handles, or ears, of very neat workmanship. Here was also a small urn of coarse brownish earth. All these things were taken out whole, except that the lip is lost from the narrow-necked vessel, which, however, I believe was broken off before it was deposited, some blackish wax still adhering to the place from whence it came off; by which, I imagine, it had been joined on with the wax, though afterwards broken off again before it was put into the ground, for it was not to be found, though we searched for it, I since put a very small piece of this wax upon a hot iron, and it immediately burst into a flame, the smoke of which gave a very strong and agreeable smell, not much unlike mastick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of OxfordSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207