MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Training on Emotional Dyslexia and Distress Tolerance in Infertile Women Undergoing Treatment in Ahvaz

2025· article· en· W6964458004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistressPopulationInfertilityResearch designEmotional distressAlexithymiaMental healthUnivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Infertility is a profoundly distressing experience that often leads to psychological challenges and mental health disorders. Throughout the demanding process of infertility treatment, couples, especially women, endure physical, psychological, and social difficulties, including emotional disturbances and reduced tolerance for distressing situations. The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral training (CBT) in improving emotional dyslexia (alexithymia) and distress tolerance among infertile women undergoing treatment in Ahvaz (Iran).Methods: This semi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included infertile women receiving treatment in Ahvaz, from whom 70 participants were selected via cluster sampling method and randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The research instruments were the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; Bagby, Parker, and Taylor, 1994) and the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS; Simmons and Gaher, 2005). The intervention comprised nine sessions of CBT-based training following Wildermut’s (2008) therapeutic framework, which was administered exclusively to the experimental group. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA/MANCOVA).Results: The findings indicated that CBT significantly improved emotional dyslexia (alexithymia) in the experimental group (effectiveness: 47.67%) compared to the control group (56.99%). Similarly, distress tolerance increased by 53.44% in the experimental group versus 34.48% in the control group. Cronbach’s alpha for all variables exceeded 0.70, confirming reliability.Conclusion: Cognitive-behavioral training served as an effective therapeutic-educational intervention, which enhanced distress tolerance and reduced emotional dyslexia (alexithymia) in infertile women.IRCT Registration Number: IRCT20240112060692N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies→French-language works237,207→