MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964460356 · doi:10.25439/rmt.27401832.v1

Circular Temporalities

2024· other· en· W6964460356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalitiesTemporalityExhibitionContext (archaeology)SituatedArchitectureMuralCounterpointScale (ratio)Assemblage (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This major commissioned art-work builds on a legacy of environmental and site-specific art and film, with particular reference to contemporary artist, researcher and academic Susan Schuppli, whose works extend site specific artistic processes to encompass the contributions of the site itself. This approach elicits an encounter between the artist, environment and audience that shifts authorship from the individual artist to the collective in an expression of what Schuppli calls ‘Nature representing itself’. Contribution: ‘Circular Temporalities’ is a site-specific installation situated in the ‘Norla Dome’, a heritage listed former gymnasium for two days in 2022. The gym was part of Melborne’s Mission to Seafarers, a global organistion that supports seamen when they come ashore. The installation considered political, spatial and temporal relationships elicited between the dome and global seafaring. This context was coupled with the formal language of the interior – a dome inspired by the Roman Pantheon – to generate a work comprising material and anecdotal histories and a 35 minute film. The film was a single take of an ocean crossing, projected on a 9-meter x 3 meter semi-translucent screen fashioned from sail-like fabric and scaffolding. The horizon bobs up and down the frame calling to mind the scale and temporality of the ocean, where seamen spend many months each year. The project invoked special significance during its installation, when seafarers were denied shore leave, due to the Covid 19 pandemic. Significance: This installation was commissioned by Dr Fleur Watson and Dr Tara McDowell for the exhibition ‘Take hold of the clouds’, a curated exhibition within Open House Melbourne 2022. My contribution to the exhibition was widely advertised through social and traditional media sources and received reviews in The Age, Architecture Australia and Memo Review. The film has been accepted into the Toronto University Film and Architecture Conference, 2023 titles ‘Intense Interiors’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.026
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207