MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploring facilitators and barriers to implement person and family-centred care in a private hospital emergency department

2024· dissertation· en· W6964481182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentQualitative researchBest practiceMEDLINEHospital careData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-person- and family-centred care, patients and their family members are involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of care. The Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario developed best practice guidelines for person- and family-centred care in May 2015. Prior to the implementation of the guidelines in the emergency department of the designated hospital, possible facilitators and barriers regarding its implementation had to be explored and described. The research question was, therefore: “What were the facilitators and barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research that could influence the implementation of the person- and family-centred care guidelines of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario in the designated hospital emergency department?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)Same topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207