MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964495616 · doi:10.26180/21655355.v1

The Legacy of a Villain: King John and the Rule of Law

2013· other· en· W6964495616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourCharterHuman rightsRelation (database)Rule of law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Her Honour discusses the important influence of the Magna Carta on the development of the rule of law, the Westminster system and modern human rights instruments. Her Honour discusses the practical application of the rule of law in Australian, Canada and the United Kingdom. Her Honour also discusses the history surrounding the creation of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), drawing comparisons between the Victorian Charter and human rights instruments from other jurisdictions. Her Honour discusses potential prospects for the enactment of an Australian Bill of Rights. Finally, Her Honour comments on the experiences of Bradley Manning and David Hicks in relation to human rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207