La Bibbia atlantica di Trento (manoscritto 326 del Museo Diocesano Tridentino)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The essay focuses on the manuscript 326 conserved in the Museo Diocesano Tridentino in Trento. This book is the second part of a Giant Bible, which was written in the third quarter of the 12th century, probably in Tuscany. The manuscript is analyzed under four main perspectives: textual, palaeographic, structural, and iconographic. The study on the Bible of Trento provides new information about the book, up to now known just for the decorative quality. The analysis of the quires and of the mise en page, as well as of the main characteristics of writing peculiar to the individual copyists, contributes to the research on the manufacturing methods. More interestingly, the study of the textual aspects has resulted in the reconsideration of the liturgical use of such giant manuscripts. An Appendix focuses on the paratextual elements present in the Bible at the Museo Diocesano Tridentino.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it