MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964783773 · doi:10.26023/2fjm-vdyy-307

SUNY-Oswego Mobile Surface Snow Observations Data. Version 1.0

2014· dataset· en· W6964783773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Observing Laboratory · 2014
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowWater equivalentSnow coverWeather stationSnowmeltLiquid water content

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains SUNY Oswego Mobile Surface Snow Observations Data collected from 7 December 2013 to January 2014. SUNY Oswego positioned 1-4 snow teams in most long lake-axis-parallel (LLAP) lake-effect events observed during the Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) project. Teams were positioned along the most intense axis of the forecasted band position and recorded snow fall depth and liquid water content (LWC) at hourly and 6-hourly periods. They also measured current conditions with a Kestrel mobile weather station and any other notable observations (e.g., hydrometeor type). These data are in Excel format (xlsx).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth Observing LaboratoryFrench-language works237,207