MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964932160 · doi:10.26153/tsw/21464

Rethinking the chansons de toile : critical evaluation and editions

2021· other· en· W6964932160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas Digital Library (University of Texas) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomancePoetryNarrativeLyricsImitationPeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Fable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genre appellation “chansons de toile” generally refers to approximately twenty poems written in Old French during the second quarter of the thirteenth century. They are short narrative lyrics which describe the romantic struggles of young women, usually pining for an absent lover or dealing with an unhappy marriage or betrothal. The genre’s name refers to toile, a type of fabric, as usually the heroines are occupied with weaving as they lament. While it is a contemporary descriptor, the genre is mostly a twentieth-century construction; however, it is remarkable to find a substantial number of poems which share so many thematic and structural elements composed over such a short period of time. The attention given these songs is largely dedicated to the centrality of women, particularly their desires and their active role in solving their plights. This, coupled with the archaic flavor of the verse (structurally as well as thematically), has historically inspired scholars to attribute these songs to actual women, or at least to claim that they are strongly and perceivably influenced by women’s songs, particularly working women’s song. However, despite the best efforts of twentieth-century scholarship, the idea that these represent “genuine” women’s song or folk song has been demonstrated as tenuous at best and fanciful at worst. The patina of court culture is indelible, and the few which are attributed to composers are attributed to literary men. This, however, presents a new problem: why then were these imitation women’s songs written? Analyzing the pastiche of archaic and courtly elements contained in these poems, particularly the anachronistic agency of their female protagonists and their close association with the chansons de geste, I argue that these poems demonstrate a nostalgia for a semi-mythic lyric past with egalitarian gender relations and happy endings. Additionally, I examine the equivalencies made between women, the past, and the folk, arguing that many of the problematic conflations made by the Romantics have a thirteenth-century precursor in the chansons de toile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it