MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964945813 · doi:10.26267/unipi_dione/3316

Techno-economic and environmental analysis of the application of onshore power supply onboard a bulk carrier : a case-study approach

2023· other· en· W6964945813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDione (University of Piraeus) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasFuel efficiencyFuel supplySupply chainEnvironmental impact assessmentReduction (mathematics)Power consumptionCapital expenditure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shipping industry plays a significant role in global greenhouse gas emissions, and efforts to reduce its environmental impact are crucial. This thesis investigates the potential of onshore power supply (OPS) to mitigate emissions by analyzing its impact on the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) of a bulk carrier vessel trading between Canada and China.
\nThe study addresses several research questions, including how OPS affects the CII, whether OPS adoption alone can meet international emission reduction targets, and the financial implications for shipowners and operators considering fuel savings. Operational data from the specific vessel, MV BulkCarrier-N1, was collected from voyage reports and performance monitoring databases for the period from January 2021 to December 2022.
\nTwo scenarios, IMO-Low and IMO-High, based on International Maritime Organization (IMO) trajectories, were developed to project future emission reduction targets. A Python model was then developed to analyze the impact of OPS and speed optimization on CIIs and fuel savings. The model incorporated inputs such as drydocking schedules, OPS installation timing, capital and operating expenses for OPS, annual revenues, speed ranges, and fuel prices.
\nThe findings indicate that speed optimization alone can meet the IMO-Low targets until 2028 and the IMO-High targets until 2027. However, sustaining the desired efficiency levels beyond these years would require additional measures. When OPS was combined with speed optimization, the impact on CIIs was found to be minimal, primarily due to the relatively small contribution of the auxiliary engine's fuel consumption to the overall fuel usage.
\nAlthough OPS showed minor improvements in CIIs, it did contribute to fuel savings. The comparison between the IMO-Low and IMO-High scenarios revealed higher short-term financial gains under the more ambitious trajectory. However, achieving long-term sustainability and meeting ambitious emission reduction targets will necessitate the implementation of additional efficiency measures.
\nThis study underscores the complex relationship between OPS adoption, speed optimization, and the achievement of international emission reduction goals. While OPS and speed optimization have potential benefits, they may not be sufficient on their own to achieve long-term sustainability in the shipping industry strategies and measures are needed such as the use of biofuels or alternative fuels (i.e. green methanol, ammonia etc.), to drive significant emissions reductions and ensure a more environmentally friendly shipping sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDione (University of Piraeus)French-language works237,207