MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

State-of-the-Art approaches for German language chat-bot development

2020· dissertation· de· W6965006926 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuereposiTUm (TU Wien) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanField (mathematics)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chat-Bots sind eines der meistbeachteten Themen der letzten Jahre. Der Hauptfokus der wissenschaftlichen Publikationen, sowie der existierenden Implementationen liegt jedoch auf Chat-Bots in Englischer Sprache. Es ist daher nicht klar, ob die beschriebenen und verwendeten Methoden sowie Werkzeuge auch in anderen Sprachen in der gleichen Art und Weise eingesetzt werden können. Diese Arbeit setzt sich zum Ziel, den aktuellen Stand der Technik im Bereich der Chat-Bot Entwicklung darzulegen, und die Anwendbarkeit der meistverbreiteten und aktuell angewendeten Methoden und Werkzeuge in Deutscher Sprache anhand einer Fallstudie zu evaluieren.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuereposiTUm (TU Wien)Same topicForest Management and PolicyFrench-language works237,207