MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6965099566 · doi:10.3205/23gmds170

Verfahren zur Übermittlung von Krankenkassendaten und deren Verknüpfung mit anamnestischen Daten der LIFE Adult Kohortenstudie zwecks der Validierung

2023· article· de· W6965099566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerman Medical Science (German Research Foundation) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical screeningMEDLINEQuality of life (healthcare)Ultrasonography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Einleitung: In der bevölkerungsbasierten LIFE-Adult-Studie wurden von 2011 bis 2014 10.000 Erwachsene im Alter von 18 bis 79 Jahren aus Leipzig eingeschlossen und einem umfangreichen Untersuchungs- und Befragungsprogramm unterzogen. Um Informationen über neu aufgetretene Erkrankungen zu erhalten, [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it