MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6965302768 · doi:10.34989/tr-12

Economic Stabilization and the Money Supply

2024· article· en· W6965302768 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBank of Canada Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsBank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggregate demandMoney supplyAggregate supplyMonetarismAggregate (composite)Interest rateMoney creationRange (aeronautics)Estimation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report the authors discuss two types of short-run deviations in the money supply from a desired growth path: (1) a random shift in the demand for money, which should be accommodated; (2) a deviation reflecting changes in the arguments of the demand-for-money function, which would require an offsetting change in short-term interest rates from the viewpoint of stabilization policy. The focus of the study is on case two. The simulated response of aggregate demand to two such deviations of the same magnitude but differing duration is compared in two models: the latest version of RDX2 and a monetarist reduced-form model. This permits the estimation of a possible range with respect to the magnitude and timing of changes in aggregate spending due to deviations from a desired monetary growth path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBank of Canada ResearchSame topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207