MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of SALT on Community and Volunteers after the 2018 Floods in Kerala A Realist Evaluation

2023· article· en· W6965536390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVU Research Portal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsAthena Sustainable Materials Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychological resilienceDistressIntervention (counseling)Community resilienceMental healthVolunteerVulnerability (computing)Social support

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volunteers are mobilised to provide psychosocial support in disaster situations despite their limited expertise and potential risk to mental health. This article examines the impact of a one-month SALT (Support, Appreciate, Listen, Team) based psychosocial intervention used by volunteers in communities affected by the 2018 Kerala floods. The results indicate positive psychosocial impact including mutual care, realisation of inner strengths, and enhanced community cohesion. The study also found that volunteers experienced positive personal growth and vicarious resilience. More research is needed to understand the pathways for translating SALT principles to sustained community building, reduced volunteer distress and enhanced volunteer resilience during volunteering and growth post the volunteering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it