MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966173059 · doi:10.48336/srqq-d546

Effect of high-pressure processing (HPP) on phenolics and their antioxidant activities of Atlantic sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa)

2023· article· en· W6966173059 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEchinoderm biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea cucumberPolyphenolAntioxidantDPPHABTS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea cucumber belongs to the phylum Echinodermata and Holothuroidea class, which contains numerous bioactive compounds, including phenolics. In particular, body wall, aquapharyngeal bulb/ flower, and internal organs/ viscera are rich sources of phenolics. Sea cucumber is harvested mainly for its body wall and muscle bands. However, during sea cucumber processing, several visceral by-products are produced, including gonad, respiratory tract, and intestine, which are ultimately discarded as waste. These visceral by-products represent up to 50% of the sea cucumber biomass and are a rich source of bioactive compounds, mainly phenolics. The most common sea cucumber found in the North Atlantic region is the orange-footed sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa, Gunnerus, 1767). However, this species is under-explored for its bioactive compounds, especially its polyphenolic composition. Hence, this study investigated the free, esterified, and insoluble-bound phenolics from different commercial body parts (tentacles and body wall) and processing discards of sea cucumber (C. frondosa), as affected by high-pressure processing (HPP) pre-treatment. For that, sea cucumber was subjected to high-pressure (2000, 4000, and 6000 bar for 5, 10, and 15 min), followed by separation into the three aforementioned fractions. The contents of total phenolics and flavonoids were determined, and antioxidant activity reflected in scavenging of DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and hydroxyl radicals was monitored. The metal chelating ability of various phenolic fractions was also evaluated. Moreover, bioactivities such as inhibition of peroxyl and hydroxyl radical-induced supercoiled DNA strand scission, LDL-cholesterol oxidation inhibition, antiglycation activity, and α-glucosidase activity were examined. Furthermore, thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay in a fish-model system was performed. Compared to untreated samples, those treated with HPP exhibited significantly higher total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activities. Treatment of 6000 bar for 10 min offered the optimal results. The free phenolic fraction was the predominant form present in all body parts examined. The highest amount of phenolics and antioxidant activity was observed in flower in the free phenolic fraction, whereas esterified and insoluble-bound phenolic fractions were more abundant in the body wall. Besides, in terms of bioactivities, all phenolic fractions showed strong inhibitory properties, mainly those that were in the free phenolic fraction. Additionally, 31, 23, and 20 phenolic compounds were identified from the flower, internal organs, and body wall, respectively, using UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. Phenolic acids, mainly p-coumaric acid, protocatechuic acid, hydroxygallic acid, and chlorogenic acid, and flavonoids, including quercetin and catechin, were the major compounds found in the different phenolic fractions of Atlantic sea cucumber. The highest amount of phenolic compounds of sea cucumber was observed as free phenolic in internal organs based on the UHPLC-MS analysis. Thus, this investigation enhances the fundamental understanding of the full utilization of Atlantic sea cucumber species and leads to the production of a multitude of value-added products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicEchinoderm biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207