MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

O Contexto Econômico e Ambiental Contemporâneo e as Novas Perspectivas em Gestão: Republicação de artigo em homenagem ao professor Omar Aktouf // The Economic and Environmental Contemporary Context and the New Perspectives for Management: Republishing an article in honor of Professor Omar Aktouf

2025· article· pt· W6966218242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Economic JusticeGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omar Aktouf, intelectual argelino, professor titular da HEC Montréal, membro fundador do centro de humanismo, gestão e globalização e do conselho científico da ATTAC Québec (Action citoyenne pour la justice fiscale, sociale et écologique) nasceu em 1944 na Argélia. Morreu em 2 de abril de 2025 em Montreal, Quebec. Tivemos o privilégio e a honra de receber o professor Aktouf para uma temporada acadêmica na Universidade Federal do Ceará, ocasião em que ministrou várias palestras na área da Psicologia Organizacional e Administração, além de contribuir com publicações e pesquisas locais. Naquela altura publicou um texto autoral na Revista de Psicologia da UFC intitulado O “CONTEXTO ECONÔMICO E AMBIENTAL CONTEMPORÂNEO E AS NOVAS PERSPECTIVAS EM GESTÃO”, no qual apresenta (em suas próprias palavras): “o resultado das minhas reflexões atuais sobre o panorama da economia mundial e, principalmente, do que muito se fala acerca da economia, da administração, da psicologia organizacional e temas correlatos”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0170.032
Scholarly communication0.0200.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicForest Management and Policy→French-language works237,207→