MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966375755 · doi:10.3886/e202701v1

Workplace Equity Survey 2023

2024· dataset· en· W6966375755 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueICPSR Data Holdings · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Survey data collectionPublishingProject commissioningDiversity (politics)Survey research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[These files include the data supporting the analysis and findings of the 2023 Workplace Equity Survey from the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC). The survey ran from May 29 to July 17, 2023, received 1,755 responses across 6 continents, with an average of 1,513 responses to the demographic questions. <br><br>, About C4DISC: In 2017, C4DISC was founded to provide a forum to discuss and address pressing equity issues among a wide array of global voices and organizations in scholarly publishing. C4DISC conducts the semi-decadal survey Workplace Equity (WE) Survey, which aims to benchmark the state of workplace equity in the global scholarly publishing landscape. Find the data from the 2018 survey under Related Publications.<br>]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0130.028
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.576

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICPSR Data HoldingsFrench-language works237,207