MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966383359 · doi:10.48336/whmh-nf08

Design and analysis of a hybrid power system for Postville Labrador Canada

2025· article· en· W6966383359 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energySizingWind powerSCADAHybrid powerHybrid systemGreenhouse gasElectric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the feasibility and benefits of designing, analyzing, and monitoring a hybrid renewable energy system (HRPS) for Postville, Labrador, Canada. In response to escalating fuel costs and environmental concerns, renewable energy sources, particularly solar and wind, are emerging as viable alternatives to conventional power generation. The study begins with optimal sizing analysis using HOMER Pro software, identifying a cost-effective configuration comprising 435 kW PV panels, five 100 kW wind turbines, a 455 kW diesel generator, and a 306 kW power converter. This setup promises reduced lifecycle costs and greenhouse gas emissions, crucial for off-grid communities. Dynamic analysis via MATLAB-Simulink validates the system's technical feasibility, demonstrating reliable energy provision under varying conditions. Advanced control strategies ensure efficient operation, with wind turbines playing a pivotal role due to regional wind energy potential. The development of a MATLAB-based SCADA system enhances operational monitoring and control, facilitating real-time adjustments for optimal performance and reliability. Implemented on a scaled-down model, the SCADA architecture successfully monitors voltage and current, showcasing robust integration and dynamic response to fluctuating loads. This HRPS not only enhances energy security by reducing diesel dependency but also mitigates climate change through lower emissions, underscoring its environmental and economic advantages for remote communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207