Revisitando la “frontera interna” en las márgenes del río Negro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El término “frontera interna”, en tanto línea divisoria entre dos sociedades, la indígena y la hispano-criolla, ha perdido buena parte de su significado o al menos se ha complejizado sobremanera a partir de numerosos avances historiográficos especialmente referidos al interior bonaerense. Sumaremos a ellos, en este caso, el análisis pormenorizado del asentamiento fronterizo del Fuerte de Carmen de Patagones, en la desembocadura del río Negro, lo cual permite ampliar la mirada hacia el conjunto del corredor pampeano-norpatagónico, con visibles extensiones hacia la Patagonia austral y el occidente cordillerano, para dar cuenta de un “espacio fronterizo” muy dinámico y permeable, ciertamente con importantes conflictos, pero también con innumerables contactos y diversas formas de convivencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".