A deep learning-based approach for efficient detection and classification of local Ca²⁺ release events in Full-Frame confocal imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The release of Ca2+ ions from intracellular stores plays a crucial role in many cellular processes, acting as a secondary messenger in various cell types, including cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells, hepatocytes, and many others. Detecting and classifying associated local Ca2+ release events is particularly important, as these events provide insight into the mechanisms, interplay, and interdependencies of local Ca2+release events underlying global intracellular Ca2+signaling. However, time-consuming and labor-intensive procedures often complicate analysis, especially with low signal-to-noise ratio imaging data. Here, we present an innovative deep learning-based approach for automatically detecting and classifying local Ca2+ release events. This approach is exemplified with rapid full-frame confocal imaging data recorded in isolated cardiomyocytes. To demonstrate the robustness and accuracy of our method, we first use conventional evaluation methods by comparing the intersection between manual annotations and the segmentation of Ca2+ release events provided by the deep learning method, as well as the annotated and recognized instances of individual events. In addition to these methods, we compare the performance of the proposed model with the annotation of six experts in the field. Our model can recognize more than 75 % of the annotated Ca2+ release events and correctly classify more than 75 %. A key result was that there were no significant differences between the annotations produced by human experts and the result of the proposed deep learning model. We conclude that the proposed approach is a robust and time-saving alternative to conventional full-frame confocal imaging analysis of local intracellular Ca2+ events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".