STUDY OF THE PROCESS OF POSTING TEACHERS TO SCHOOLS IN THE MINISTRY OF SECONDARY EDUCATION: THE LINK WITH THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SOUTH REGION OF CAMEROON
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Career management and postings, in particular, are real imbroglios in the Ministry of Secondary Education. The criteria considered are not very objective and are perceived as unfair. This situation negatively affects students' academic results. A mixed study was carried out to establish the link between the process of posting teachers to schools and the academic performance of students. It shows that, for a non-probability sampling by reasoned choice of 113 teachers, the Pearson correlation test gives the results that family situation, health and the centralisation of the posting process of teachers have a strong negative influence on the school performance of students in Cameroon. These different results confirm that there is a relationship between the process of posting teachers and the academic performance of students. Article visualizations:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it