MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966531614 · doi:10.4224/200001

Archives des publications du Conseil national de recherches Canada

2009· dataset· fr· W6966531614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2009
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Access to informationAgency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Archives des publications du Conseil national de recherches Canada sont un dépôt institutionnel qui comprend des dossiers de citations pour des rapports d'entreprises, des rapports techniques, des publications évaluées par des pairs (comme des articles, des délibérations, des livres et des chapitres de livres), des exposés, et d'autres types de publications qui ont été parrainées par le CNRC, ou produites ou publiées par au moins un employé du CNRC pendant, avant ou après son emploi au CNRC. Veuillez noter que, bien que le contenu de ce dépôt soit extensif, il ne comprend pas la totalité des publications produites par le CNRC. La collection d’archives date de 1916 à ce jour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0180.042
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.096

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositoryFrench-language works237,207