MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966638129 · doi:10.4224/sh5r-6t35

Quebec Construction Code, Chapter I: Building, and National Building Code of Canada 2015 (amended)

2022· standard· en· W6966638129 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2022
Typestandard
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuilding codeResilience (materials science)Work (physics)Fire safetyFire protectionALARMResearch councilQuality (philosophy)Efficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document, published by the National Research Council of Canada in collaboration with the Régie du bâtiment du Québec, contains both the new edition of Chapter I, Building, of the Quebec Construction Code and an amended version of the National Building Code of Canada 2015 that clearly indicates the changes adopted by Quebec. With its user-friendly format, the document is an essential resource for designers, contractors, owner-builders and regulatory officials in Quebec. The document sets out technical requirements for all construction work on buildings and facilities intended for use by the public in Quebec. Numerous updates have been incorporated in this edition to improve the level of health, safety, accessibility, fire and structural protection, energy efficiency and water-use efficiency provided by buildings and facilities. Significant updates include: • design requirements for barrier-free bathtubs and showers have been revised to enhance safety and accessibility • the integrity of fire separations has been improved to reduce the risk of fire spread • Fire alarm and detection systems have been improved to facilitate the safe and timely evacuation of building occupants • the apparent sound transmission class (ASTC) has been introduced to enhance the sound isolation between dwelling units • provisions for wind, snow and ice loads have been updated, increasing the climate resilience of buildings • minimum distances of outdoor air intakes from sources of contaminants have been specified to improve indoor air quality for the safety of building occupants • design requirements for stairs, ramps, handrails and guards have been updated to reduce the risk of falls

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1310.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCFrench-language works237,207