MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966939044 · doi:10.4224/20133409

Global ice impact forces on the CCGS Amundsen, Beaufort Sea

2012· report· en· W6966939044 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2012
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCanadian Wood CouncilNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaufort seaSea iceAccelerationImpactBoreholeArctic ice packCollisionSea level

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global ship impact forces on the CCGS Amundsen are quantified here for 44 impacts with multi-year ice floes in the Beaufort Sea. Global impact forces were derived from an inertial measurement system called MOTAN. In general, global forces of up to 9.0 MN were measured for maximum impact speed from 3.1 to 10.2 kt. Most of the impacts were conducted with two floes of known thickness and strength. Only two floes were sampled during the two-week program, but they characterized a wide spectrum of multi-year ice. Floe B1S1 was the thinner of the two floes (7.2 m), quite warm, saline and relatively weak (the depth-averaged borehole strength of the two test holes was 7.3 MPa and 4.5 MPa). Floe B1S2 was thicker (8.0 m), colder, less saline and stronger (the depth-averaged borehole strength of the uppermost 7 m of ice was 22.0 MPa). As anticipated, global impact forces and ship accelerations were higher during collisions with the thicker, stronger floe than the weaker floe, for comparable ship speeds. The highest surge acceleration (1.03 m/s²) occurred during the final ram with Floe B1S2 which was conducted at a maximum impact speed of 6.7 kt. That collision generated the highest global impact force of the program: 9.0 MN. The highest heave acceleration (0.84 m/s²) and sway acceleration (0.46 m/s²) occurred during rams with Floe B1S1, while transiting to a natural harbour within the floe. Global forces from 18 impacts with isolated multi-year floes floating in open pack ice were comparable to many of the rams with Floe B1S1, for a given impact speed. Comparison of the Commanding Officer’s expected ice severity for the 18 impacts indicated that even experienced personnel can have difficulty ascertaining the competency of multi-year ice. Impact forces and accelerations measured by MOTAN on the CCGS Amundsen were comparable to MOTAN-derived measurements on the CCGS Terry Fox from oblique impacts with bergy bits. The maximum heave, surge and sway accelerations on the CCGS Terry Fox were respectively 0.57 m/s², 0.56 m/s² and 1.24 m/s² during the Bergy Bit Trials, with measured global impact forces of up to 10.6 MN. Global impact forces and accelerations on the CCGS Amundsen during this study were not nearly as high as the impact forces measured by other instrumentation systems on ships operating more aggressively in Beaufort Sea multi-year ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCFrench-language works237,207