MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6966944514 · doi:10.48765/xq0p-e188

A randomized, open-label study of the tolerability and efficacy of one or three daily doses of ivermectin plus diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (IDA) versus one dose of ivermectin plus albendazole (IA) for treatment of onchocerciasis

2023· dataset· en· W6966944514 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsIvermectinAlbendazoleTolerabilityAdverse effectDiethylcarbamazineAnthelmintic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data collected from participants at during a clinical trial in Hohoe, Ghana where participants are identified by a unique participant ID. There are two datasets. The Safety dataset includes demographics, skin snip results, adverse event results, and ophthalmological data from baseline, day of treatment, Day 1-7, Month 3, Month 12, and Month 18. The Nodulectomy data set contains data pertaining to sectioned nodules read by scientists at 18 months which indicate embryogenesis in female worms, number of male and female worms, and worm calcification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine)French-language works237,207