MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6967083145 · doi:10.5061/dryad.5hqbzkhgt

Juvenile and adult sea Lamprey behaviour (twitch and movement)

2025· dataset· en· W6967083145 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLampreyJuvenileFish <Actinopterygii>PetromyzonSound (geography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea lamprey are invasive fish species in the Laurentian Great Lakes and parasitically feed on many commercially important fishes. Sound has been used as a deterrent for invasive species, but its potential for manipulating sea lamprey behaviour in natural stream conditions is under-tested. Both the behavioural acoustic threshold and differential responses at different life stages of sea lamprey have also yet to be established. To fill in some of these literature gaps, low-frequency tones of 70 or 90 Hz were used in a laboratory setting to determine the behavioural responses of adult and juvenile sea lamprey. Both stages of sea lamprey exhibited a change in swimming behaviour and a twitch (startle) in response to both frequencies. Adults had a lower threshold to 70 Hz than 90 Hz tone bursts with juveniles showing no difference between frequencies. These thresholds and behaviours can be used in natural settings to control or impact the behaviour of sea lamprey to aid in directing lamprey movement either toward existing traps or away from fish bypass structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→