ANALISIS PERENCANAAN PEMETAAN KAWASAN DAN PENERAPAN KEPEMILIKAN IJIN PENAMBANGAN PASIR YANG BERLEBIHAN DAN ILEGAL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the planning of areas and the implementation of excessive and illegal sand mining permit ownership. This type of research is qualitative. Primary and secondary data were used as the data sources. The primary data were based on interview results. Secondary data uses figures and data, books and scientific journals which are used as the basis for scientific literature. The data analysis technique uses thematic analysis. Primary data are obtained from interviews with the Environmental Service and Mining Actors or workers in the Humbang Hasundutan Regency. The results of the study showed that sand mining in Purba Baringin Village, Pakkat District, and Humbang Hasundutan Regency was still found in many who did not have permits, and many met the need for sand from outside the district itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it