Orcevia gongae Yu & Zhang 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orcevia gongae Yu & Zhang, sp. nov. (Ẩ氏ĸ尔¤) Figs 100–109 Type material. Holotype: ♂ (MHBU-ARA-00023546; DNA Voucher: KYU037), CHINA: Guangxi Province, Nanning City, Wuming District, Mt. Daming, 21 May 2011, leg. Y. Wang. Etymology. The specific epithet is in honor of Ms. Linjie Gong (Shanghai), a spider lover who has given tremendous help to the first author in collecting specimens. Diagnosis. It can be distinguished from all congeners by the presence of a sharp and up-pointed embolic apophysis at the retrolateral side of embolus (Figs 105, 108, 109). Description. Male (holotype). Habitus as shown in Figs 100–101. Carapace length 2.41; abdomen length 2.73; measurements of eyes: AME 0.45, ALE 0.28, PME 0.05, PLE 0.20; measurements of legs: I 4.23 (1.19, 0.85, 0.94, 0.75, 0.50), II 3.67 (1.20, 0.71, 0.67, 0.61, 0.48), III 3.85 (1.22, 0.68, 0.71, 0.78, 0.46), IV 4.37 (1.35, 0.68, 0.95, 0.89, 0.50); leg formula 1432. Carapace dark, cephalon covered by relatively dense yellow setae, with yellowish setal band at each lateral side; front edge of clypeus with one row of sparse white setae; dorsal abdomen with four longitudinal narrow yellow setal bands. Melanic areas on legs I–II distinct. Palp (Figs 102–104): palpal bulb rather swollen, lobe-like protrusion of tegulum short and stout; embolus straight in ventral view, with a prolateral extension at distal half and one sharp embolic apophysis at retrolateral side, surface of embolus rough; apophysis of embolic disc low (Fig. 109); RTA horn-like in retrolateral view; pro-ventral hump of tibia pointing ventrally, obvious in prolateral view (Fig. 103); ventral femoral bump (VFB) relatively high. Female. Unknown. Distribution. China (Guangxi).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".