MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6967232339 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10601697

Acalypha diminuta Baill.

2023· article· en· W6967232339 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesEndangered speciesDeciduousEndemismRiparian zoneHabitat destructionHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Acalypha diminuta Baill. Histoire physique, naturelle et politique de Madagascar, Atlas, 2, fasc. 27: t. 194 (Baillon 1891). — Type: pl. 194 in Baillon (1891), holotype. ICONOGRAPHY. — Baillon (1891: pl. 194); Leandri (1942: 254); Fig. 28A. ETYMOLOGY. — The specific epithet probably refers to the small size of the male segment of the inflorescences. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Diana, Sofia, Boeny, Melaky, Menabe, Atsimo-Andrefana, Androy, and Alaotra-Mangoro [only one collection]). Dry deciduous forest, spiny thickets; sometimes in riparian forest. On Tertiary limestone, sandstone, and unconsolidated sand. Altitudinal range (40-) 50-850 (-1450) m (Fig. 13). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha diminuta is estimated to be 310 217 km 2 and its AOO 104 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows mainly in the western dry deciduous forests. Most of these forests are highly degraded (40%) and the major threat to the dry deciduous forests is slash-and-burn clearing for grazing and agricultural lands. Grasslands and pastures have replaced the forests in the western slope and the central highlands (Moat & Smith 2007; Gautier et al. 2018). Ongoing habitat loss will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha diminuta is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) under criterion B. It meets the AOO values needed for a threatened category, but the number of locations is too high to meet the conditions required for listing it under the Endangered category. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 44 collections. Madagascar. Appert, O.P. 31 (P[P04779831]), 41 (P[P00360914]); Bosser,M.J.13885 (P[P04779814, P04779816]), 13993 (P[P04779821, P04779824]); Capuron, R. 20581- SF (K, P[P05547246]); Cours, G. 1819 (P[P05547244]); d’Alleizette, Ch. s.n. (L[L0241302]); Decary, R. 16089 (K, P[P05547245]), 16122 (P[P05547250]); Gillespie, L. 4034 (US [US01287336]), 10704 (MO); Grevé, H. 223 (P[P00360915]); Hladik, A. AH7158 (P[P00780280, P00780618]); Humbert, H. 11237 (B[B100009884], P[P00508516, P00360918]), 11288 (P[P00360919]), 11335 (BR [BR0000005045020], NY, P[P00508515, P00360917]), 11506 (P[P00360916, P00508517]); Jard. Bot. Tananarive 5749 (P[P00360923]); Keraudren-Aymonin, M. 25933 (P[P00360920]); Leandri, J. 489 (K, P[P05547061]), 491 (US [US01287337]), 3533 (P[P05547060]), 3569 (B[B100480050], G, NY, P[P05547243]), 3620 (G, P[P05547242]); Lorence, D. 2084 (K, P[P00360921]); Peltier, J.1432 (P[P05547022]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 379 (P[P05577069, P05577067]), 9632 (P[P00508520, P00508521, P00360922]), 9816 (P[P00508519, P00360924, P00360925]), 9818 (P[P00360499, P00360500, P00508518]), 9819 (P[P05547062]); Phillipson, P.B.2431 (MO, P[P00360497]), 2750 (K, MO, P[P00360498]); Pichon, C. CP113 (P[P00780436]); Rakotozafy,A. 319 (P[P05547065]); Ralimanana, H. 239 (G[G00405396], DBEV, K, MO[MO-2965792], P[P05481882], TAN); Richard, M. 173 (K), 547 (K); Service Forestier Madagascar 16576-SF (P[P00360912, P00508522, P00508523]), 27956-SF (P[P00360913]); Seyrig, A. 254 (P[P05547066]), 254B (P[P05547064]), 254 C (P[P05547063]); Wohlhauser, S. SW 310 (G[G00405345], P[P04779528]). REFERENCES. — Baillon (1895b: 1197); Palacký (1907: 25); Pax & Hoffmann (1924: 21); Leandri (1935: 42); Leandri (1942: 253); Govaerts et al. (2000: 60); Sagun et al. (2006: 124); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 95). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, deciduous, to 3 m tall, monoecious. Branches laxly pubescent with simple, short, curved trichomes and simple, erect trichomes, glabrescent when mature; brachyblasts present. Axillary buds subspherical, to 1.2 × 1 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, brownish, glabrous. Stipules to 3 mm long, lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, ciliate with some sparse, simple, short trichomes. Petioles 0.2-0.3 cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades 3-5(-5.5) × 1.4- 2 cm, usually elliptic to elliptic-lanceolate, sometimes narrowly elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to cordate; apex obtuse and mucronate; margin entire to crenate towards apex, teeth rounded; upper surface subglabrous, with some sparse, simple trichomes on veins; lower surface glabrous, with flattened resinous glands; venation pinnate, secondary veins 5-7 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences racemose, androgynous, terminal, to 5 cm long, mostly female with short male segment; peduncle filiform, to 30 mm long, appressed-pubescent. Female segment to 2 cm long; bracts 1-7, not enlarging in fruit, to 1 mm long, lanceolate, sparsely hairy; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 0.5 cm long; flowers in racemose to subumbelliform cluster; bracts to 0.8 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, sparsely hairy with simple, arachnoid trichomes. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.8 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 1 mm diameter,sparsely hairy with simple, arachnoid trichomes. Female flowers 1 per bract, pedicellate; pedicel to 7 mm long, indumentum similar to that on peduncle; sepals 5, to 0.8 mm long, triangular, ciliate with simple trichomes to 0.5 mm long; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, papillose, surface glabrous but with flattened resinous glands; styles 3, to 2.5 mm long, distinct, glabrous, each divided into c. 10 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 4 mm diameter, papillose, glabrous, with papillae more or less capitate, surface glabrous but with flattened resinous glands. Seeds c. 2 mm diameter, globose, minutely foveolate. NOTES 1) Acalypha diminuta was first illustrated, without description, in Baillon’s Histoire Naturelle des Plantes (Baillon 1891). The first description of this species, based only on Baillon’s illustration, appears in Engler’s Pflanzenreich (Pax & Hoffmann, 1924); and 2) this is one of only two species included in Acalypha subgen. Androcephala Pax & K.Hoffm.; the other is A. gillmanii Radcl. -Sm. of eastern Africa (Levin et al. 2022).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→