Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora Thomson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
40. Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora Thomson * (Illustrations in Lee and Ahn, 2017, Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Thomson 1867. Casey 1910. Gusarov 2003. Majka and Sikes 2009. Lee and Ahn 2017. Klimaszewski et al. 2018. Distribution. Holarctic, recorded from Europe, China, India, Japan and South Korea. Canada: AB, BC, LB, MB, NB, NF, NS, NT, ON, PE, QC, SK, YT. USA: AK, MA?, NH (NSR), NY, PA, RI. Collection and Habitat data. Specimens in NH were captured by window traps, and were found in fungi and in leaf litter at a birch sap drip. Collected from May to September. In Canada found in various mixed, coniferous, and hardwood forest types, usually in decaying materials such as decaying fungi and carrion. Collected by: Lindgren funnel traps in red spruce forest with red maple and balsam fir, unbaited pitfall traps in red spruce forest, spruce forest in decaying fleshy fungi, mixed forests on Pleurotus sp. on Populus log, red oak and red maple forest in gilled mushrooms, alder swamp on remains of dead deer, and rich Appalachian hardwood forest in fleshy fungi in various stages of decay. Also in compost, poplar/spruce litter, carrion, bison and caribou dung, and under the bark of decaying spruce logs (Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Strafford Co.: 4 mi W Durham, 7–10.V.1982, 10–13.VI.1982, 9–12.VII.1982, 29.VII–1.VIII.1982, window trap, R.M. Reeves, 6 females, 1 sex?; 10.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, mushrooms, 1 female. Barrington, 6.IX.1986, fungus, W.J. Morse, 1 female. 1 mi SW Durham, 21.V.1982, sift leaf litter birch sap drip, D.S. Chandler, 1 male, 2 females, 19 sex? Kingman Farm, 3.5 km N Durham, 47m, 3–17.IX.2009, ZOOL 745/845 class, forest, FIT, 1 female. Spruce Hole, 3 mi SW Durham, 21–23.VII.1987, 10–23.VII.1987, D.S. Chandler, FIT, 2 males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".