Hoplandria (Lophomucter) laevicollis NB, ON, QC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
180. Hoplandria (Lophomucter) laevicollis (Notman) (Illustrations in Génier 1989, Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Notman 1920. Moore and Legner 1975. Seevers 1978. Génier 1989. Brunke et al. 2012. Webster et al. 2016. Klimaszewski et al. 2018. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: NB, ON, QC. USA: DC, FL, GA, LA, ME (NSR), NC, NH (NSR), NJ, NY, VA. Collection and Habitat data. The ME and NH specimens were collected primarily by flight intercept traps, and also taken from pig dung in a pasture. Adults found from July to September. In Canada (ON) collected by a Malaise trap in a hardwood forest (Brunke et al. 2012). Also found on a dead buzzard, rotten bird eggs, and live mushrooms on a fallen tree in unspecified habitats (Génier 1989). NB specimens were found in rotten bolete mushrooms in an old jack pine forest; one was also taken from a Lindgren funnel trap in a trembling aspen stand (Webster et al. 2016). Material. USA, Maine, York Co.: West Lebanon, 1–7.VII.1991, 1 female; 12–17.VIII.1991, 1 female, D.W. Barry, FIT. New Hampshire, Grafton Co.: Bedell Bridge St. Park @ Oliverian Brook, 4–14.VII.1992, 2 females; 15–26. VII.1992, 1 female; 20.VIII–8.IX.1992, D.S. Chandler, FITrap, 1 male. Strafford Co.: Spruce Hole, 3 mi SW Durham, 29.VII.1986, S.C. Sherman, pig dung in pasture, 1 male.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.205 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".